<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on a Greater Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/thoughts-on-a-greater-conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/thoughts-on-a-greater-conversation/</link>
	<description>combining design, journalism, and technology. when i feel like it, anyways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/thoughts-on-a-greater-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/?p=111#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Futhermore:

Social media will bring WOMEN in, which will be vital. (What can I say, it&#039;s the Wellesley in me.)
http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/03/women-use-social-media-more-than-men/

The NYT is experimenting with different forms of commenting. A discussion of their changes and the necessity of making sense of the high volume of news article reader comments:
http://strange.corante.com/2009/10/01/new-york-times-more-innovation-in-commenting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Futhermore:</p>
<p>Social media will bring WOMEN in, which will be vital. (What can I say, it&#8217;s the Wellesley in me.)<br />
<a href="http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/03/women-use-social-media-more-than-men/" rel="nofollow">http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/03/women-use-social-media-more-than-men/</a></p>
<p>The NYT is experimenting with different forms of commenting. A discussion of their changes and the necessity of making sense of the high volume of news article reader comments:<br />
<a href="http://strange.corante.com/2009/10/01/new-york-times-more-innovation-in-commenting" rel="nofollow">http://strange.corante.com/2009/10/01/new-york-times-more-innovation-in-commenting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/thoughts-on-a-greater-conversation/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 05:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/?p=111#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Edit (well not really, technically):

This is what I&#039;m talking about-  http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/02/engagement-not-unique-visitors-should-be-no-1-goal/

News organizations should take note of the fact that we&#039;re interested in social networks. News can be social, too! It&#039;s possible, I promise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit (well not really, technically):</p>
<p>This is what I&#8217;m talking about-  <a href="http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/02/engagement-not-unique-visitors-should-be-no-1-goal/" rel="nofollow">http://beatblogging.org/2009/10/02/engagement-not-unique-visitors-should-be-no-1-goal/</a></p>
<p>News organizations should take note of the fact that we&#8217;re interested in social networks. News can be social, too! It&#8217;s possible, I promise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
