<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REBECCA E SPITZER &#187; community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/tag/community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog</link>
	<description>combining design, journalism, and technology. when i feel like it, anyways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s Catch-22</title>
		<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/11/todays-catch-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/11/todays-catch-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism & Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellesley college]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to illustrate what I think it lacking in the news media with a Wellesley conundrum. 
I just sat in on a round-table about Social Networking at our annual Tanner Conference, and I left it still thinking about a number of issues, including questions about where people source their news from and whether they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="drop">I</span>&#8217;d like to illustrate what I think it lacking in the news media with a Wellesley conundrum. </p>
<p>I just sat in on a round-table about Social Networking at our annual Tanner Conference, and I left it still thinking about a number of issues, including questions about where people source their news from and whether they trust their sources. I passed by some copies of the Wellesley News and realized that I never read the Wellesley News, even though I&#8217;m quite interested in journalism. I never read the News because I assume that I&#8217;ll hear about anything newsworthy on Community, our online forum for general discussion, debate, and advertising spam. I&#8217;d like to talk about this issue more with people on campus, perhaps people that are in my major or that are interested in the same questions. </p>
<p>My first thought was to post my epiphany on Twitter, as I often do these days. But I don&#8217;t think I could fit the thought into 140 characters, and I don&#8217;t think it would elicit any discussion. I could, alternatively, post about it here (which I am doing right now, technically&#8230;) but that won&#8217;t prompt any discussion, either.</p>
<p>I could bring the topic up in a classroom, but I&#8217;m not studying anything in class right now that relates directly to this question of news access on campus.</p>
<p>I could go all old-school and just talk to someone face to face, but even that is improbable.</p>
<p>The one thing I could do that would probably elicit the response I&#8217;m looking for is post to Community itself to talk about Community, which is a little redundant, but it&#8217;s a conclusion I find interesting. I suppose I&#8217;m still not quite sure where I&#8217;m going with this, but at least I know this &#8211; we need a better forum for conversation about issues, and the forum needs to connect us with the audience we&#8217;re looking for. I want to talk to a specific subset of people about specific issues, but I don&#8217;t want to just send them an email, for that would be too direct. What other options are there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/11/todays-catch-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
