<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>REBECCA E SPITZER &#187; google news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/tag/google-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog</link>
	<description>combining design, journalism, and technology. when i feel like it, anyways.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>This is for all the non-believers.</title>
		<link>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/this-is-for-all-the-non-believers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/this-is-for-all-the-non-believers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism & Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s national newspaper week! I was checking out the feed of relevant editorials on google news and ran across this gem of an article from the Mount Airy News in NC: The Internet Will Never Match What a Newspaper Offers.
Here are some of my favorite parts:
Yet perhaps the most important factor that will ensure newspapers’ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="drop">I</span>t&#8217;s national newspaper week! I was checking out the feed of <a href="http://news.google.com/news/story?cf=all&amp;ned=us&amp;hl=en&amp;ncl=dzl3XWc-TIQH3FM4KNpcERHaxSmAM">relevant editorials on google news</a> and ran across this gem of an article from the Mount Airy News in NC: <a href="http://www.mtairynews.com/pages/full_story/push?article-The+Internet+will+never+match+what+a+newspaper+offers%20&amp;id=3809341-The+Internet+will+never+match+what+a+newspaper+offers&amp;instance=secondary_opinion_left_column">The Internet Will Never Match What a Newspaper Offers</a>.</p>
<p>Here are some of my favorite parts:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yet perhaps the most important factor that will ensure newspapers’ survival at least on a small-town scale involves the sheer fact that, just like a good novel, a newspaper offers a kind of intimacy. There’s a closeness involved in touching, and reading, a paper which computers never will be able to match.</p>
<p>For example, curling up in your favorite easy chair with the latest newspaper edition (or a good book) is a normal part of life. Curling up in a chair with a computer (even if it’s a laptop) is not practical at all.</p></blockquote>
<p>More:</p>
<blockquote><p>Plus, with all the great things that the digital world can accomplish, I’ve never heard of anyone placing a computer screen on the refrigerator as you can with a newspaper clipping. And computers don’t fit too well in scrapbooks, either.</p>
<p>Of course, a person can print out a newspaper article from a Web site, but it’s just not the same thing. There is just something more authentic about seeing a bride, a Little League team or a birth announcement on a piece of newsprint rather than a computer printout that someone might have faked for all anyone knows.</p></blockquote>
<p>And finally:</p>
<blockquote><p>The bottom line is that newspapers are really the only medium that be assured of reaching a mass audience with comprehensive information needed for citizens to exist in today’s society.</p>
<p>And just like we can expect libraries and bookstores to still be around in bad economic times, there is every reason to believe the plug won’t be pulled on newspapers, either.</p></blockquote>
<p>First of all, I agree that newspapers aren&#8217;t going to totally die out, at least not for a long, long time. And I understand the frustration and confusion that comes with this digital revolution. But seriously? This argument is falling apart from the very beginning. I curl up with my laptop all the time. I print things out from the internet without any concern that they might be fabricated (and I hear stories about companies that fake newspaper pages for low prices, so don&#8217;t tell me that newspapers are free of misleading fakes). Oh, and did you hear about the libraries that are closing? Don&#8217;t expect all of our libraries to stay around forever, and don&#8217;t expect them to have quite as many real books as in the past.</p>
<p>Thinking even farther ahead, I&#8217;d like to rebuke the statement that &#8220;There&#8217;s a closeness involved in touching, and reading, a paper which computers never will be able to match.&#8221; Trust me, someday computers will match that closeness. (My computer feels like more a part of me than any other object I&#8217;ve ever owned or touched, but that&#8217;s beside the point.) One day, paper will be computerized. Don&#8217;t make the mistake of assuming that computers will always be big monitors with GUI interfaces that you hold feet away from your face and control with a mouse and keyboard. Those days will soon be over. On an even simpler level, how long do you think it will be before the door of your refrigerator is a computer screen? No need to &#8220;place a computer screen&#8221; there &#8211; it will be able to display anything you like. Lastly, since when is a problem with internet news the fact  that &#8220;computers don&#8217;t fit too well in scrapbooks&#8221;? Come on.</p>
<p>The bottom line is not that newspapers are the only medium reaching a mass audience. The bottom line is that you, Tom Joyce, can&#8217;t see what&#8217;s right in front of you. Start adapting now, before it&#8217;s all too much and you find yourself protesting against the Internet with your equally uninformed buddies in the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rebecca-e-spitzer.com/blog/2009/10/this-is-for-all-the-non-believers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
